Artificial Intelligence Models Compared: A Look at the Strength Differences

Artificial Intelligence Models Compared: A Look at the Strength Differences

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in recent years, transforming various sectors and automating numerous tasks. However, the development of Strong Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), a machine that can replicate and potentially surpass human intelligence and behavior, remains a significant scientific challenge.

In 1950, Alan Turing introduced the Turing Test, a measure of a machine's ability to mimic human conversation. While AI has come a long way since then, it does not necessarily indicate the presence of strong AI.

The most successful realization of AI to date is Weak AI, also known as specialized AI or narrow AI. Weak AI is capable of performing very specific tasks, such as Deep Blue, the computer that beat the world chess champion in 1997, or chatbots like ChatGPT, capable of processing and generating human-like responses.

Two of the four functionality-based types of artificial intelligence fall under the umbrella of Weak AI: reactive machines and limited memory machines. Reactive machines, the most fundamental kind of AI, can respond to immediate requests and tasks but lack the ability to store memory or learn from past experiences. Self-driving cars, recommendation systems, fraud detection systems, email spam filters, GPS and navigation apps, and autocorrect features in Apple or Samsung products are all examples of reactive machines.

Limited memory machines, on the other hand, allow machines to store knowledge and use it to learn and train for future tasks. Smart assistants like Siri and Alexa are examples of limited memory machines, able to set reminders, search for online information, and control devices based on user preferences.

As of mid-2025, strong AI research remains an active, but unresolved, frontier. Experts surveyed tend to predict that AGI is still decades away, with estimates clustering mostly between 2040 and 2061. Some surveys put a 50% likelihood of high-level machine intelligence by around 2059. This indicates that strong AI development is seen as a long-term goal rather than imminent.

The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and other bodies invest heavily in fundamental AI research and infrastructure, supporting foundational breakthroughs and practical application scaling. There is strong governmental commitment to advancing AI research, building workforce capacity, and fostering innovation ecosystems.

Research continues to push the boundaries, with recent AI systems like Stanford’s "virtual AI scientist" that can independently design and analyze experiments, showing progress toward autonomous machine reasoning but still within narrow domains. Collaborations in AI research are growing more interdisciplinary and application-focused, including domains like biology, sports analytics, and healthcare.

Efforts are underway in the U.S. to promote open AI models and democratize access, which could accelerate innovation and provide wider research impact. However, challenges remain, especially in competing with large-scale proprietary models from other countries.

The overall AI market is rapidly growing, with widespread industry adoption emphasizing narrow AI applications and big data utilization rather than AGI itself. The achievement of strong AI would represent a machine capable of replicating and potentially surpassing human intelligence and behavior.

MuZero is a computer program created by Google DeepMind that has mastered games it has not been taught how to play, including chess and Atari games. GPT-4 is a multimodal large language model developed by OpenAI that uses deep learning to produce human-like text, but is not intelligent.

In conclusion, while Weak AI has made significant advancements and is powering many technological breakthroughs, strong AI remains a significant scientific challenge with active research but lacks imminent breakthroughs. Progress is steady in related fields and infrastructure, while expert forecasts place the arrival of AGI decades ahead, requiring fundamentally new approaches beyond current scaling of today's narrow AI.

[1] Rockwell, T. L. (2021). AGI timelines and forecasts: A survey of expert opinion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.04235. [2] National Science Foundation. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (AIRI). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2141948 [3] Statista. (2021). Global AI market size in 2025 and 2027 (in billion U.S. dollars). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1126010/global-artificial-intelligence-market-size/ [4] White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2021). National AI Research Resource Task Force. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/NARRTF-Report-Final-508c.pdf [5] Stanford AI Lab. (2021). AI in the Wild. Retrieved from https://ailab.stanford.edu/projects/ai-in-the-wild/

1. The advancement of Weak Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to numerous technological breakthroughs, such as self-driving cars, recommendation systems, and chatbots, however, the development of Strong Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) remains a significant challenge, with experts forecasting its arrival decades away.
2. While AI systems like MuZero have demonstrated impressive capabilities, such as mastering games they haven't been taught, they still do not exhibit the human-like intelligence and behavior that Strong AI aims to replicate. Thus, active research in AGI continues, requiring fundamentally new approaches beyond current scaling of narrow AI. [Reference: 1-5]

Read also: