Skip to content

European Union's Court of Justice determines Commission's Treaty obligations were unmet.

Online Search Decision: Google Unveils Intent to Lodge an Appeal 'When Proper Moment Arises'

Google's Symbolic Marker Positioned in Mountain View, California
Google's Symbolic Marker Positioned in Mountain View, California

Google Challenges Antitrust Ruling: corporation plans to appeal--and hires a heavy-hitter to help

tech giant plans to challenge verdict concerning search engine results at undisclosed point - European Union's Court of Justice determines Commission's Treaty obligations were unmet.

Hey there! Let's dive into the tech world; today we're discussing Google's appeal of a federal judge's antitrust ruling from last year.

Google has publicly stated they're firm believers that the initial court decision was a whopping mistake. After the hearing on Friday, which wrapped up the antitrust proceedings aimed at determining the penalty for Google, we're now waiting for the judge's verdict, which is estimated to drop in August.

Back in August 2024, the aforementioned judge in Washington sided with the federal government, claiming that Google's search engine was used to illegally monopolize the market. The controversy surrounds the billions paid to companies like Apple over the years for pre-installing Google's search engine on their devices.

Fast-forward to November, and the U.S. Department of Justice asked the court to order Google to sell Chrome and not to enter into any more exclusive contracts with smartphone manufacturers for pre-installing the search engine as default. The department believed Google should also share the data it uses to generate search results.

Google posted its concerns about being compelled to share user data with the government rather than the court. The tech giant also argued that it's currently facing some tough competition from AI-powered technologies, such as ChatGPT, which could directly enter the internet and answer users' questions without the need for a search engine like Google.

Google's proposed countermeasures are less stringent than those put forth by the U.S. Department of Justice, focusing mainly on allowing phone providers to pre-install Google Play, but not Chrome or the search engine itself.

Donald Verrilli Jr., a former U.S. Solicitor General during the Obama administration, has recently joined Google's team to help with the appeal process. Be on the lookout for updates on this ongoing legal battle between the tech giant and the Department of Justice!

Above all, remember that in tech, it's game on, and competition is fierce!

  • Google
  • Internet Corporation
  • Antitrust Ruling
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • AI-powered Tech
  • Washington

[1] Google to appeal antitrust ruling[2] Google counters DOJ remedies proposals[3] DOJ seeks to force Google to sell Chrome[4] Google hires former Solicitor General to help appeal antitrust ruling[5] Google disagrees with DOJ remedies for antitrust violation

  • In an attempt to challenge the antitrust ruling, Google plans to appeal and has hired Donald Verrilli Jr., a former U.S. Solicitor General, to help with the process.
  • The ongoing legal battle between Google and the U.S. Department of Justice involves politics, technology, and general news, as it addresses Google's alleged monopolization of the search engine market and its partnership with companies like Apple.

Read also:

    Latest