Skip to content

Sensor Size Comparison: Full Frame vs Cropped

Pros and Cons of Whole-frame versus Trimmed Imaging Sensors

Sensor Comparison: Full-Framed Vs. Cropped
Sensor Comparison: Full-Framed Vs. Cropped

Sensor Size Comparison: Full Frame vs Cropped

Underwater photography often involves choosing between different types of camera sensors: Full Frame, Cropped (APS-C), Micro Four Thirds, and Compact sensors. Each type offers distinct advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages and Disadvantages by Sensor Type

Full Frame Sensors

  • Advantages:
  • Superior image quality with better low-light performance and greater dynamic range.
  • Generally produce less noise and better color depth.
  • Capability to use wide-aperture lenses for shallow depth of field.
  • Disadvantages:
  • Larger and heavier, requiring more substantial underwater housings.
  • Generally more expensive not only for the camera but also for the housing and lenses.

Cropped (APS-C) Sensors

  • Advantages:
  • Smaller and lighter than full-frame systems, making them somewhat easier to handle underwater.
  • Often more affordable than full-frame systems while still offering good image quality.
  • Better telephoto reach due to the crop factor.
  • Disadvantages:
  • Lower image quality compared to full-frame, with potential for more noise and less dynamic range.
  • Requires a larger housing compared to Micro Four Thirds.

Micro Four Thirds Sensors

  • Advantages:
  • Compact size makes the entire setup smaller and more convenient for underwater use.
  • Offers a wide range of lenses with good optical quality.
  • Generally more affordable than full-frame systems.
  • Disadvantages:
  • Image quality may not match that of full-frame, though it is still very good.
  • Depth of field can be deeper due to the smaller sensor size, which may not be ideal for all creative applications.

Compact Sensors

  • Advantages:
  • Extremely compact and lightweight, perfect for casual divers or those needing a small setup.
  • Often waterproof without needing a separate housing, making them very convenient.
  • Typically more affordable than interchangeable-lens systems.
  • Disadvantages:
  • Limited image quality and performance in low-light conditions.
  • Less control over settings (e.g., aperture, shutter speed).
  • Lens quality may not be as high as in larger systems.

General Considerations

When choosing a sensor type for underwater photography, key factors include cost, portability, and desired image quality. Full-frame sensors offer superior image quality but are larger and more expensive. Compact sensors are convenient but compromise on image quality. APS-C and Micro Four Thirds sensors provide a balance between size, cost, and image quality.

  • Compact underwater cameras allow changing wet lenses underwater, giving the ability to go from wide angle to macro during a single dive.
  • Compact underwater cameras can be noisy at high ISO owing to less dynamic range.
  • Cropped sensors produce approximately 60% more depth of field than a full-frame sensor, given an equivalent field of view.
  • APS-C (or 1.5x cropped sensor, 1.6x for Canon) are popular with underwater photographers.
  • Compact underwater cameras are way cheaper, but the cost can escalate when adding wet lenses, adapters, etc.
  • Well-liked compacts include Canon GX-7 Mark III, Olympus TG-6, and Sony RX100 VII.
  • A full frame sensor measures 36 x 24 mm, while an APS-C sensor measures 22 x 15mm, making the full frame sensor effectively 2.6 times larger.
  • Full frame cameras produce better quality images in low light conditions (high ISO performance).
  • Full frame sensors offer superior optics, resulting in better image quality with increased dynamic range, better contrast, and images that 'pop'.
  • The Olympus OM-D EM5 Mark III and the Panasonic GH5 are popular cameras that use micro-four-thirds sensors.
  1. For superior low-light performance and greater dynamic range, full-frame DSLRs are preferred for underwater photography, but they are larger, heavier, and more expensive.
  2. Cropped (APS-C) cameras offer a balance between size, cost, and image quality compared to full-frame, with better telephoto reach due to the crop factor.
  3. Micro Four Thirds cameras are compact, providing a wide range of lenses with good optical quality, and they are more affordable than full-frame systems.
  4. Compact cameras are the smallest and lightest, perfect for casual divers or those needing a small setup, often waterproof without needing a separate housing, and usually more affordable.
  5. When choosing a sensor type, cost, portability, and desired image quality are key factors, with full-frame offering superior image quality but being larger and more expensive, and compact sensors compromising on image quality for convenience.
  6. Changes in wet lenses can be made underwater with compact underwater cameras, allowing for transitions from wide angle to macro during a single dive, but these cameras can be noisy at high ISO due to less dynamic range.
  7. The Olympus OM-D EM5 Mark III and the Panasonic GH5, both using micro-four-thirds sensors, are popular choices among underwater photographers, producing images with increased dynamic range, better contrast, and better color depth.

Read also:

    Latest