Skip to content

Sony engages in a fierce battle with a minor game studio hailing from Hong Kong

Sony objects to a trademark application by a small Hong Kong app developer due to perceived similarity to a renowned gaming subsidiary.

Sony is engaged in a heated, feline-inspired dispute with a modest gaming company hailing from Hong...
Sony is engaged in a heated, feline-inspired dispute with a modest gaming company hailing from Hong Kong.

Sony engages in a fierce battle with a minor game studio hailing from Hong Kong

Ready to jump into the feline-themed trademark drama between electronic behemoth Sony and the laidback Hong Kong-based app dev, Naughty Cat Co.? buckle up, mate!

On June 5, Sony's legal eagles sent up a flare to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, often known as the USPTO, taking issue with a trademark application by the Naughty Cat gang. And what was the reason behind this teapot tempest, you ask? The Naughty Cat crew were aiming to trademark the name "Naughty Cat."

Now, this simple trademark application has catapulted them into a legal tussle with Sony. Sony accuses the name "Naughty Cat" of being too purr-dang similar to their game development studio, Naughty Dog.

In Sony's eyes, the never-ending battle of feline superiority isn't even a dust-up on the horizon; no, it's just a walk in the park because Sony can't seem to spot the differences between the two. But whether that'll hold water at the U.S. Patent Office is another story.

Naughty Dog vs Naughty Cat – Get the lowdown!

Naughty Cat is a kitten on the block, only boasting two apps on Apple's App Store, and both centered around gambling games with real cash prizes. This ain't a AAA game developer we're dealing with here, just an everyday app develooper.

Naughty Dog, on the other paw, has claws dug deep into the gaming world. A video game development studio founded in 1984, they've given birth to some of Sony's most revered game franchises. From Crash Bandicoot to Jak and Daxter, to the Uncharted series and The Last of Us, it's Sony's most enduring exclusive game titles that have been crafted by Naughty Dog.

As you'd expect, Sony's protective instincts kick into overdrive when it comes to their trademarks, and Naughty Dog is no exception, especially trademarks relating to a first-party game studio for PlayStation consoles.

According to documents reviewed by the entertainment juggernaut IGN, Sony's argument for opposing Naughty Cat's trademark registration hinges on the name being "confusingly similar to the Naughty Dog trademark" they already own.

The issue, as far as Sony sees it, is that "Naughty" is the first, dominant element in both names. And while "Dog" and "Cat" might seem worlds apart in their respective domains, Sony's filing claims that they're like two peas in a pod because both refer to common house pets.

Sometimes, legal squabbles make you want to bark up the wrong tree. Such is the case with this trademark rumble.

Even if Sony succeeds in this legal showdown, it's unlikely to leave much of a scratch on gamers. If you've played any of Naughty Cat's games (Cash Trip: Solitaire & Bingo and Bubble Bravo - Win Real Cash), it's a safe bet you didn't even notice the name of the app developer when you downloaded the game. So if Naughty Cat has to change its name, most folks probably won't even notice.

Sony's contention that the two trademarks are too similar because they share the initial "naughty" seems a stretch. Not a single person has ever mistaken their cat for a dog – at least not that we know of!

T.S. Eliot must have had this very scenario in mind when he penned Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats. In the "Ad-dressing of Cats" segment, Eliot wrote, "How would you address a Cat?/ So first, your memory I'll job,/ And say: A CAT IS NOT A DOG." Even that sentiment found its way into the musical Cats, appearing as the final song of the show.

Suffice it to say, this is a most unusual claim from Sony – it's purring absurd, one might say (meow).

Further insights

  • The trademark dispute centers around the risk of consumer confusion, with Sony aiming to protect the distinctive identity and reputation of Naughty Dog's brand by claiming similarities between the two trademarks.
  • The case could set a precedent in entertainment, potentially influencing how smaller or emerging companies name their products and studios in the gaming and app industries to avoid conflicts with larger players.
  • By opposing confusingly similar trademarks, Sony helps ensure clear marketplace association and consumer protection, contributing to market integrity.
  • Sony currently holds no trademark for the word "naughty," as you can't trademark random words; a word or phrase must indicate the source of your goods and services.
  • To ensure a clear outcome for this legal wrangle, the USPTO will rely on an assessment framework that considers factors such as the similarity of the marks, the relatedness of the goods and services offered, the channels of trade, and the likelihood of consumers being confused.

Disclaimer: This content is intended for informational purposes only. If you need legal advice, seek your attorney's counsel on the matter. The information presented here does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such.

More from our fabulous website!

  • *Next-gen PlayStation and Xbox consoles may share a surprising similarity – but is that a good thing?*
  • *ROG Ally X vs Xbox Ally X – Real differences or clever marketing?*
  • **Steam users are flocking back to this disliked game in massive numbers – and it's sold for just $4!
  1. The ongoing legal dispute between Naughty Dog and Naughty Cat may have far-reaching implications for gadgets and technology, potentially shaping future naming practices in the gaming and app industries.
  2. While Sony's legal team contends that the names Naughty Dog and Naughty Cat are too similar, their case may not hold up when assessed by the USPTO, given that no single person has ever mistaken a cat for a dog.
  3. If Sony successfully opposes the registration of Naughty Cat's trademark, it could set a precedent in the entertainment industry, making it more challenging for smaller developers to choose distinctive names that don't risk infringing upon larger companies' trademarks.
  4. Naughty Cat's current portfolio primarily includes gambling games for smartphones, while Naughty Dog is renowned for developing AAA games for PlayStation consoles, showcasing the significant differences between the two entities.
  5. In this cat-and-mouse game, the USPTO will consider factors such as the similarity of the marks, the relatedness of the goods and services, the channels of trade, and the likelihood of consumer confusion when determining the outcome of this trademark dispute.
  6. As this legal battle unfolds, enthusiasts of gaming, technology, and gadgets will eagerly await updates on the evolution of the trademark war between Sony and Naughty Cat, eager to see if the outcome will have significant consequences for the gaming industry and the broader tech landscape.

Read also:

    Latest