Skip to content

Why Refurbishing Buildings Frequently Yields a Greener Option than Demolition

In a noteworthy report by McKinsey and the World Economic Forum, the significance of circular retrofitting in safeguarding natural resources has been underscored.

Title: Unveiling the Political Amidst India's Demolition Debates
Title: Unveiling the Political Amidst India's Demolition Debates

Why Refurbishing Buildings Frequently Yields a Greener Option than Demolition

As the demand for built environments soars, the question lingers: should we tear down existing structures to make way for new developments or strive to repurpose and reuse existing buildings as much as possible? Recent analyses by McKinsey and the World Economic Forum emphasize the pivotal role of circular retrofitting in preserving natural resources, achieving decarbonization goals, and unlocking numerous lucrative opportunities.

The study underscores that retrofitting is a cost-effective alternative, cutting emissions by an impressive 75% and slashing costs by 77% compared to constructing new buildings. To meet global net-zero targets, the retrofit market must expand from its current $500 billion to an astonishing $3.9 trillion by 2050. Such expansion could result in a substantial reduction of 500 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually and divert materials worth $600 billion from landfills by 2050.

Retrofitting not only minimizes emissions and reduces costs but also plays a significant economic role. McKinsey partner and report co-author Sebastian Reiter referred to this transformation as a "significant opportunity financially," with retrofit work estimated to be a $1 trillion market. Reiter believes that retrofitting can reduce raw material consumption, which has tripled over the past 50 years, and facilitate the renewable energy transition by ensuring buildings are more energy-efficient.

World Economic Forum executive committee member Fernando Gómez emphasizes the urgency of finding sustainable solutions to fulfil the growing global demand for built environments. He points out that, while retrofitting will primarily involve insulation and meeting new energy efficiency standards, people will increasingly value living and working in energy-efficient buildings that support their personal commitments to sustainability.

Gómez highlights the growing awareness around the importance of protecting construction materials and utilizing them for extended periods rather than demolishing existing buildings and starting anew. He also notes that large-scale retrofitting will necessitate new ways of thinking about technology and a more structured approach to the built environment.

McKinsey senior partner Jukka Maksimainen asserts that retrofitting results in reduced carbon footprints and shorter construction times. He adds that, as approximately 80% of 2050's building stock already exists today, a large portion of it will need to be repurposed or remodeled to meet future needs.

Arup's global leader of circular economy services, Martin Pauli, believes that embracing circularity through retrofitting has the potential to address challenges like climate change. By upgrading existing buildings, energy consumption can be reduced, and facilities can adapt to future temperature increases without relying excessively on carbon-intensive materials required for new construction.

However, retrofitting still demands materials, such as insulation, concrete, and steel, to enhance energy efficiency and structural integrity. The key, according to Pauli, is to source these materials sustainably and reuse what we already have. Businesses and governments are starting to recognize the potential of this approach, but making it a global standard is imperative.

Timber Development U.K.'s sustainability director, Charlie Law, emphasizes the importance of keeping construction materials in use and operating at high value for as long as possible. He suggests opting for durable and demountable materials that can be reused repeatedly over long periods, often for hundreds of years. Law suggests that timber is an excellent choice for such projects due to its light weight and the potential to extend the floorplan of existing structures without additional modifications.

In conclusion, the demand for sustainable building solutions is growing, and retrofitting plays a crucial role in achieving net-zero targets, preserving natural resources, and reducing carbon emissions. Additionally, retrofitting presents significant economic opportunities, from material cost savings to the creation of a thriving $1 trillion market. By embracing sustainable sources and reusing materials, buildings can become more energy-efficient, long-lasting, and adaptable, facilitating the transition to a more sustainable future.

McKinsey, in their recent analysis alongside the World Economic Forum, strongly advocates for the expansion of the retrofitting market, highlighting its potential to reduce carbon emissions and divert waste from landfills. At the World Economic Forum, executive committee member Fernando Gómez stresses the importance of finding sustainable solutions for fulfilling the growing demand for built environments, with retrofitting playing a significant role in this regard.

Read also:

    Comments

    Latest